Menu
I had my scanned at Jeffrey Tucker's request, and the CMAA covered the cost, all I had to do was ship it. I got it back with the binding cut off, and put it in a binder for my own use. As I understand it, a large portion of the CMAA is volunteer, so perhaps you can be that volunteer which provides a few books for the CMAA online library! I'm not sure if the budget is still there to scan books, but if people have books in their libraries they are willing to sacrifice, it's worth talking to someone about it!
![Romanum Romanum](https://thumbs.worthpoint.com/zoom/images1/1/0416/09/breviarium-romanum-1942-latin-roman_1_8281ec5954b66745bf84940249902999.jpg)
Breviarium Ambrosianum (The Rite of the Archdiocese of Milan, is as old as, if not older than, the Roman Rite.This Rite is not a 'usage'.) 4 (winter 1, 2, summer 1, 2) Latin, but not the Vulgate as found in most other breviaries of the Roman Rite or its various usages.
![Traditional breviary Traditional breviary](/uploads/1/2/5/4/125499871/508878209.jpg)
This is a case where we have just about everything except the real deal. Examples: My understanding is that, at the time, there was never published an edition with the traditional Gallican psalter, as the Pian psalter was expected to catch on. Even so, access to any full '62 breviary would be invaluable, given that sites like do not provide the same information that an actual book does in terms of arrangement, rubrics, etc. You would think that as the breviary is right up there with the '62 Missale Romanum in terms of importance, it would be around somewhere, but no one seems to have done anything about it. This is a case where we have just about everything except the real deal. Examples: My understanding is that, at the time, there was never published an edition with the traditional Gallican psalter, as the Pian psalter was expected to catch on.
Even so, access to any full '62 breviary would be invaluable, given that sites like do not provide the same information that an actual book does in terms of arrangement, rubrics, etc. You would think that as the '62 Breviarium Romanum is right up there with the '62 Missale Romanum in terms of importance, it would be around somewhere, but no one seems to have done anything about it.